Wednesday, February 24, 2010

My catharsis is complete



i haven't posted for awhile - i've been ruminating. i received a lot of opinions on a previous post entitled photo ethics. i had to do a good bit of thinking about and evaluating all of the information that i received. to those of you who took the time to write, i thank you. opinions were wide spread and all contained thought provoking reasons for seeing things the way you all did.


so, i have finalized my thought process. from this point forward, i am no longer a photographer, rather i have decided that i am a photographic artist. i will use my shooting and computer skills to enhance, change or create the image that i will present to the world. whether it represents an accurate representation of the scene which actually existed, or it is what i saw in my mind's eye, or whether it is simply the path that the image and i took through the computer after snapping the shutter, i reserve the right to make it whatever my little heart desires. (of course you're probably thinking to yourself that i always had the right to do just that, but i was endlessly concerned that i wasn't presenting the image as faithfully as i could/should).

take for example, the image above. it's a shot from a series that i took this week at fort popham, in phippsburg, maine. although to begin with, i know good and well that the camera is incapable of capturing the scene in the same way i saw it with my eyes. nevertheless, i have decided that i want to process it in an entirely different light (pun intended).


the top image is straight out of the camera (actually, it's one of three bracketed shots). the second, of course, is the image after a lot of post processing. it's how i want the world to see it. it probably sounds like a no brainer to you, but in the past, this much altering of the original image would cause me to wail and gnash my teeth.... but not anymore.


i'm cured.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Shameless Plug




I just found out this morning that one of my photos has been selected for inclusion in the 10th edition of the Schmap Boston Guide. It's a photo of the headstone for the victims of the Boston Massacre, located in the granary Burying Grounds in Boston, Mass.


The Schmap Guide is available online, as well as a stand alone application for the iPhone and iPod touch.


Hey, it ain't much, but every little bit helps...


here:
http://www.schmap.com/boston/activities_downtowncrossing/#p=348802&i=348802_36.jpg


and here:
http://www.schmap.com/?m=iphone#uid=boston&sid=activities_downtowncrossing&p=348802&i=348802_36

Monday, February 8, 2010

Photographic Ethics (my take)



Here's a subject that has bothered me for years. I would enjoy hearing from you on this subject, too. Please feel free to leave a comment.


The entire concept of "a picture never lies" is no longer true. The computer age has done as much to harm photography, as it has done to help it. One thing cannot be denied - the computer has forever changed photography.


From Joseph Niepce's first photographic image in 1814, through the 1980s, photography remained relatively unchanged. Certainly, methods of capturing images and types of photographic mediums and equipment changed, but the validity of the viewed image was rarely questioned or doubted. The camera recorded the subject, film was processed and prints were made. It was fairly easy to decide if a photographer was talented or not. Just look at a bunch of his or her photos and if they had a reasonably large number of great ones, there you go.


I remember in the pre- computer, digital age (as recently as the mid 1980s), when I saw a really great photo, I would always wonder "how did he/she get that shot? Were they just lucky, or were they just that good?" The authenticity of the image never came into question, only the details of acquiring it.


I don't know about you, but for me that is no longer true. Now, when I see a jaw dropping shot, I wonder "is this a real shot, or is this the product of some Photoshop wizardry?" It causes me to question what I see. To my way of thinking, this is a bad thing. It has required me to re-think how the concept of photography fits into my head.

Photography has always struggled to be seen as a true art form. It was argued by many that if a monkey were sent out with a camera and an unlimited supply of film, eventually he would take a great shot. (The law of averages, I think they said. Plus, it's probably true).

Today, with digital cameras that practicially guarantee proper exposure and focus, and memory cards which can hold 100's of not 1000's of images, many of us have become the aforementioned monkey. And, armed with an ever expanding arsenal of post-processing software, we can take really mediocre shots and make them look world class. And then, in a heartbeat, they are posted to the internet for all the world to see and marvel at.

Some will say that this is a good thing, but is it photography? (It is definitely not the photography that existed before the computer age). What has this new freedom, afforded us by the digital age, done to photography? It certainly has changed it, but has it also cheapened it? We are so inundated with images everyday, that we are becoming more and more desensitized to good photography. Thanks to digital cameras and Photoshop, almost everyone can produce prize winning images.


And, so here lies the problem as I see it. I believe that when everyone is a great photographer (either because they take great photos, or using Photoshop they make great photos), then no one is a great photographer. I remember watching Harry Nilsson's animated movie "The Point". Our hero Oblio was lost in the forest and happening upon a road sign with a thousand arrows on it all pointing in different directions, he became confused. Then a tall man came along and Oblio asked him about the sign. The man looked at the sign, turned to Oblio and said "a point in all directions is the same as no point at all". My point exactly...

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Hi and Welcome to my Shiney New Blog!

as my first blog entry, i thought i'd let you know what this will hopefully be all about. my one long standing passion in life has been photography. i have been immersed in it (in its many forms- more on that later), all of my adult life.



i also enjoy sharing what i have learned, so i will have tutorials and how-to's, as well as maybe even revealing secret locations (!) that i love, both in my home state of maine and elsewhere.



my other passion in this life is my love of the great unspoiled (or at least moderately unspoiled) outdoor locations in the world. as i'm sure you know, by unspoiled, i mean not mucked up by man (or woman, for that matter - they're just as capable). that is why most of my photography tends to be devoid of people. a great portrait photographer i am not, nor have i aspired to be. but i have paid my dues (more on that later).



i won't bore you with all the details of growing up in the midwest (places like detroit and chicago), but i will tell you that living in the 'burbs and seeing nothing but cement, asphalt and steel taught me the value of the natural world (or what's left of it).



so, here's a novella tracing my photographic path. hopefully, it will make for some entertaining reading. if not, just skip to the next entry (where i reveal secret photographic locations!).



it all started in the winter of 1971, in a suburb of detroit, where i checked out my buddy's new makeshift darkroom he had just set up in his parents' basement. it consisted of old blankets hung from the ceiling rafters to form a lightproof (sort of) enclosure. as i stood bathed in the warm sensual glow of a 30 watt red safelight bulb, i watched in amazement as an image appeared on the sheet of photo paper soaking in the developer tray. from that moment on, i was forever hooked! i purchased a used (and somewhat beat up) kodak folding camera and a couple rolls of verichrome pan roll film, some developer, stop bath, fixer and 5x7 doubleweight fiber base printing paper and i was on my way! there was no formal training, everything was trial and (mostly) error.



since i didn't have a clue about what it took to be a real photographer, between college courses i worked in photofinishing labs so i could be around photography. by the time i had quit (or gotten fired from) my third lab job, i finally figured out that the photofinishing industry had nothing to do with making photographs. i then thought maybe working in part time camera stores was the answer. after a stint or two in that arena, i concluded while it was somewhat closer, it still wasn't the ticket, as they say. i mean i was seeing lots of photographs, it's just that they weren't mine. i guess i was just too picky.



all the while i was trying to get my groove on, i was shooting, developing and printing all my own work. (almost all of it black and white - for the occasional roll of color print film, i relied on those damn photofinishing labs!) but my work was advancing and in the process was leaning heavily towards color, almost exclusively slide film. i had become a scuba diver along the way and underwater photography seemed like a natural extension of my craft. but underwater photos didn't lend themselves well to black and white, so i basically abandoned black and white for many years.



oh well, the decade was over anyway. my fiance and i bid adieu to florida and moved to new hampshire. in the process of seeking gainful employment i happened to show my portfolio to the hiring manager for a medical microfilming company, who then proceeded to offer me a job running their photo lab; it turned out to be a great learning experience, as i learned so much about film characteristics, controlling light and predicting your final results (real photo science stuff!)



during my tenure there, a number of my fellow employees noticed how much camera equipment i had amassed over the years, and figured i would be a competent wedding photographer. it was a good thing i didn't charge them much! what i lacked in skill, i made up for with passion and enthusiasm. i learned as i went and as i got better at it, more people hired me to capture their "special day". hey, i was making money at photography! who would've thought?



well, towards the latter part of that decade, my wife decided it was time to move back to maine. (anyone who has ever married a mainer knows that you can't keep them away from their state indefinitely). well maine, being a rural state and all, didn't offer the wealth of job opportunities i had anticipated (insert sarcasm here), so after a couple more episodes with some of the local photo labs (what, again? hey, at least this time they were professional photolabs), i felt that i had learned enough over the years to actually go into business for myself.



so i managed to get a loan, found a space for a studio and viola, foreside photographics was born. whereas i was pretty tech savvy and had, over the years developed a fairly good eye, i was not the least bit prepared for dealing with the wild, wacky world of advertising agencies, temperamental art directors and the ever present deadlines. boy, did i ever have to hit the ground running! but after awhile, i found my stride and began to really enjoy it. this was during the waning days of big photo shoot budgets, models, stylists and catered meals in the studio. life was good, too good. digital had yet to rear its ugly head. but i could feel its hot breath on my neck...



well, i was a hungry, relatively young photographer and was not about to refuse any job that paid good money, so naturally, given my track record, i started jonesing for weddings. little did i know that ad agencies would not chance embarrassing themselves by bringing in the same photographer who shot the client's daughters wedding to shoot the client's annual report. and, so began the super-secret, dark and clandestine world of foreside photographics commercial photography and foreside photographics wedding photography and senior portraits! i felt like a double agent! it was quite a balancing act at times, but i managed to keep one from discovering the other.



well, nothing ever stays the same, does it? turns out that those new fangled digital cameras had finally arrived on the scene (early models in 35mm format came in at around $30,000). as luck would have it, a few of the local commercial photogs could afford them. (dirty little secret #1 - many of the local commercial photogs were trust fund babies, so they could afford almost anything). be that as it may, literally overnight most of the agencies' art directors were seduced by the digital darkside. being able to see images out of the camera immediately, instead of having to wait 3 whole hours for the photo lab results simply toppled them. they went limp and slobbered like pavlov's dogs at this new digitial wonder. several of the agencies i had spent years busting my hump for cast me aside like yesterday's newspaper. i wasn't the only one, most of my colleagues who didn't have the coin suffered the same fate. my income was cut in half - but thank monte zucker i still had weddings.



wedding photography was lucrative in those days. moms and dads wanted their children's weddings to be memorable - but the big day was over so fast. why, what better way to preserve those fleeting memories than with a big, fat, full of photos wedding album, courtesy of foreside photographics wedding photography and senior portraits? life was once again good. however, spending every friday night, saturday, and sometimes sunday from april to november in a church or local v.f.w. hall gets old fast. but since foreside photographics commercial photography had become a pale shell of its former self, i persevered. for about 6 years, all told. hundreds and hundreds of cake cuttings, garter tosses and more renditions of "and you're daddy's little girl" than even the guests at guantanamo bay should have to endure.



fortunately, help arrived just in time. an adjunct faculty position opened at a local community college - teaching computer technology and photographic techniques no less! well, this was a very good thing, as i had lots of experience at both and the freedom to create new programs and classes and then unleash them on unsuspecting students! i schlepped in lots of old studio equipment and we had lighting and modeling sessions. i dragged the students on photographic outings! they submitted their work for review (and chastisement)! it was all so good (for about 5 years, anyway), until the new college president decided that our department wasn't making enough money (or maybe no money, who knows?) and proceeded to dissolve the entire continuing education division. bye bye.



so, for the past several years, i have gone into a type of photographic hibernation, as it were. but this slumber was not to be permanent -despite overwhelming odds, the photographic flame refuses to be extinguished inside of me.



i have found new inspiration, possibly due to my time away from photography. the camera to me is an old friend (a very old friend) and i feel it to be an extension of my heart. even though digital cameras and computer software have forever changed (and re-shaped) the photography that i have known for over 39 years, i still feel to need to express myself with my lens - and my mind's eye.

-gary